Entries in climate change (12)

Monday
05Oct2009

The Time Has Come

Copenhagen 09 is right around the corner. The first decade of the new millennium wasn't exactly the smoothest ride ever. We started off pretty badly and have gone down many bad roads in response to our fears, selfishness, and xenophobia. Copenhagen 09 is our opportunity to give the world something to remember this decade by. Let's stand up together and tell our leaders the action that we really want. Let's make this the defining moment of this decade. Let's take a stand.

 

 

Wednesday
17Jun2009

Settle the science of climate change - A response to the recent article in the Times Colonist

A recent article in the Times Colonist is a prime example of how the media can take information from sources that are less than credible and promote them as fair players in an intellectual discussion. Read the Times Colonist article and then check out the following analysis on the authors from a climate expert at the University of Victoria (Thanks Jeremy Fyke!).

Subject: Article Response: Settle the science of climate change (Times Colonist)

Hello,

I've spent some of my precious research funding doing some background on the NIPCC report.

As you will see below, I take square aim at the reliability of the authors. Far from 'a group of respected academics', they are at best academics (mostly retired) with a peripheral knowledge of current climate science research and memberships in free-market lobbyist groups, and at worst self-employed online bloggers, paid employees of coal industry associations, and retired welders (seriously).

In short, the writer of the editorial simply pulled this document off the web and with no QA/AC published it as an equal to the IPCC report. It helped that the Heartland Institute formed the report to mimic the layout of the IPCC report (right down to calling it the NIPCC, presumably to make the point that the IPCC is government-controlled, which it isn't). In fact, this is a completely biased piece of fiction that was funded and published simply for the benefit of special interests groups (namely, coal, oil and gas companies). Frankly I was blown away at how easy it is to link that fact up! It should not be taken seriously, even with a grain of salt. It has been roundly and universally discredited by climate scientists as cherry-picked nonsense.

Please spread the news far and wide, read below for details on all contributors to the report, and expect a letter to the editor from the UVic Climate Lab in response.

Jeremy Fyke, PhD Candidate
Climate Modeling Group
School of Earth and Ocean Science
University of Victoria

PUBLISHER:

Heartland Institute: "Discovering, developing, and promoting free-market solutions to public policy problems." Institute has directly received over $791,000 from ExxonMobil, continuously since 1998 (records exist to 2007).

PRIMARY AUTHORS:

  • Fred Singer: According to a January 2007 report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, Singer is affiliated with 11 think tanks and associations that have received funding from ExxonMobil. Singer's "Science and Environmental Policy Project" (SEPP) has recieved $20,000 from ExxonMobil. A search of Google Scholar with keywords "climate" and author "Fred Singer" indicates no peer-reviewed articles with Fred Singer as lead author (there are 2 in which he is a secondary author, in which climate model output is compared to observations). He is also well known for arguing against second-hand smoke as a cause of cancer (with proven funding provided by Philip Morris), and against the effects of ozone depletion.
  • Craig Idso: Founder and chairman of the board of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, which is funded in part by the ExxonMobil Foundation ($100,000 since 1998, up to and including 2007) and the Western Fuels Association, which "is a not-for profit cooperative that supplies coal and transportation services to consumer-owned electric utilities throughout the Great Plains, Rocky Mountain and Southwest regions". Craig Idso, along with his brother Keith, was a former employee of the Western Fuels Association, and a weblink exists directly from the Western Fuels Association to the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change (see here). The Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change scientific and policy advisors consist of (see here): a soil scientist, a plant biologist, a managing director of Summit Energy Group ("consortium of energy and natural resource consulting companies"), a president of a "non-profit organization dedicated to the principle that societal decisions must be based on best available scientific information", a forestery professor, a physics professor (interested in space plasmas), a zoologist, and a horticulturalist.

SECONDARY AUTHORS:

  • Warren Anderson: no background information found. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Warren Anderson" in Google Scholar.
  • Scott Armstrong: MSc., industrial administration, PhD, Management. Currently Professor of Marketing, Wharton School (a business school), Pennsylvania.
  • Dennis Avery: Senior Fellow at Hudson Institute, "a non-partisan policy research organization dedicated to innovative research and analysis that promotes global security, prosperity, and freedom." Currently a food policy analyst.
  • Franco Battaglia: Professor of Environmental Chemistry, University of Modena. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Franco Battaglia" in Google Scholar.
  • Robert Carter: Stratigraphic geologist. On the research committee of the Institute for Public Affairs, which is "an independent, non-profit public policy think tank, dedicated to preserving and strengthening the foundations of economic and political freedom"
  • Piers Corbyn: runs WeatherAction, which uses "Piers Corbyn's Solar Weather Technique". He declines to publish his techniques in peer-reviewed journals. His webpage says (including typos):
    "The technique uses predictable aspects of solar activity -particle and magnetic effects from the Sun -as the basis for forecasting weather many months ... and even years ... in advance." He carries out organized betting based on his weather predictions.
  • Richard Courtney: No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Richard Courtney" in Google Scholar. Formerly technical editor for CoalTrans International, the "web's most comprehensive resource" on the coal industry" and spokesperson for the British Association of Colliery Management, a British coal industry union.
  • Joseph D'Aleo: Execcutive Director, International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, the Heartland Institute (see Publisher information).
  • Don Easterbrook: professor emeritus, Dept. of Geology, Western Washington University (Bellingham, Washington). Specialty: geomorphology, glacial geology, pleistocene geochronology, environmental and engineering geology. No peer-reviewed papers listed on "Publications" section of personal website.
  • Fred Goldberg: received "doctors degree" in welding technology. See published biography (from Arizona senior men's club) here.
  • Vincent Gray: No peer-reviewed articles on subject of climate change published. Last peer-reviewed article, on coal technology, published 17 years ago. Member of the Scientific Advisory Committee for the Natural Resource Stewardship Project lobbying group (webpage not currently active). Group refuses to disclose sources of funding, but Director is a registered lobbyist for the Canadian Gas Association and the Canadian Electricity Association.
  • William Gray: researcher, Colorado State University Tropical Meteorology Project.
  • Kesten Green: Research associate, department of Business and Economics at Monash University in New Zealand.
  • Kenneth Haapala: no reliable information available. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Kenneth Haapala" in Google Scholar.
  • David Hagen: no reliable information available. No peer-reviewed aticles matching keywords "climate", author "David Hagen" in Google Scholar.
  • Klaus Heiss: no reliable information available. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Klaus Heiss" in Google Scholar.
  • Zbigniew Jaworowski: Retired professor of atomic radiation. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Zbigniew Jaworowski" in Google Scholar. Fraudulently claimed to have authored a statement titled "Climate change: incorrect information on pre-industrial CO2" for the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
  • Olavi Karner: Affiliated with Tartu Observatory, Estonia. Apparently, works on remote detection of clouds and time series analysis of climate data. Several peer-reviewed articles exist on Google Scholar, with only peripheral significance to climate change.
  • Richard Allen Keen: instructor, Department of Amospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado. One relevant peer-reviewed article matching keywords "climate", author "Richard Keen" in Google Scholar in which Keen is 3rd author on paper modelling precipitation variations over Greenland, 1993.
  • Madhav Khandekar: Retired Environment Canada scientist. 19 peer-reviewed articles found, relating to El Nino and climate. Listed as member of Calgary-based Friends of Science, which is 1/3 funded (as of 2006) by oil and gas sector, and the Natural Resource Stewardship Project lobbying group (webpage not currently active, see above for background).
  • William Kininmonth: Retired meteorologist. No peer-reviewed publications on "climate change" (desmogblog.com search). Writer for Lavoisier Group, founded by Hugh Morgan, CEO of Western Mining Corporation, and recent publisher of "Thank God for Carbon".
  • Hans Labohm: listed as one of the "nation's leading experts on climate change and related topics" and a former economist for Netherlands Institute of International Relations on Heartland Institute website (see above for background). No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Hans Labohm" in Google Scholar.
  • Anthony Lupo: associate Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Missouri. Meteorologist. Listed as expert member of Marshall Institute.
  • Howard Maccabee: Medical doctor, PhD in radiation biophysics. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Hans Labohm" in Google Scholar.
  • Michael Mogil: BSc, MSc meteorology, former National Weather Service employee, online writer and math tutor (personal homepage here). No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Mogil" in Google Scholar.
  • Christopher Monckton: Officially the "Lord Monckton, Third Viscount Monckton of Brenchely". Trained in journalism. Listed as 'climate expert' by the Heartland Institute, and a Chief Policy Advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute (president: Robert Ferguson, member of the Senate Republican Policy Committee and former Chief of Staff to Congressman Rick Renzi (R-AZ)).
  • Lubos Motl: former theoretical physicist. Retired 2007, age 36. Currently maintains personal blog. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Lubos Motl" in Google Scholar.
  • Stephen Murgatroyd: "Author, consultant, imagineer" (personal website blog). Has "worked extensively in distance education, both at The Open University in the UK (1972-1985) and at Athabasca University (1986-1998 and 2003-2005). He also worked on e-learning and e-consulting activities while with Axia Corporation (1998-2002)." He is a "psychologist by training".
  • Nicola Scafetta: Research Scientist, Department of Physics, Duke University. Current research topic: "Nonlinear and stochastic mathematical models of complex physical and biomedical phenomena at the Physics and Medicine departments at Duke University, Durham (NC)". Published peer-reviewed work on solar output (Geophysical Review Letters, 2006). Work does not dispute human-induced climate change via greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Harrison Schmitt: former Apollo astronaut. From 1994-1998, Chairman and President of Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy (currently Chairman Emiritus). Center has received $973,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
  • Tom Segalstad: Associate Professor of Resource and Environmental Geology and head of Geological Museum at University of Oslo. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Tom Segalstad" in Google Scholar.
  • George Taylor: Instructor, meteorology, Oregon State University. Scientific advisor to Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change (see above for organization background). Peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "George Taylor" in Google Scholar involve details of Pacific Northwest observed climatology.
  • Dick Thoenes: Professor Emiritus of chemical engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. No peer-reviewed articles matching keywords "climate", author "Dick Thoenes" in Google Scholar.
  • Anton Uriarte: Professor, Physical Geography, University of the Basque Country, Spain. One peer-reviewed article on climate change found on Google Scholar (regarding Younger Dryas paleoclimatic period, RAM: Revista del Aficionado a la Meteorología, 2003).
  • Gerde Weber: PhD, Meteorology. Currently, scientist with the German Coal Mining Association.
Monday
15Jun2009

Dr. Robert Gifford on the Human Dimensions of Climate Change

This is the second video in a series from the recent Fish and Wildlife and Climate Change Symposium from the University of Victoria.

 

Tackling the Human Dimensions of Climate Change Adaptation for Fish and Wildlife - Dr. Robert Gifford from Mark Haines on Vimeo.

Saturday
25Apr2009

5 Ways to Fight Climate Change...All Without Alternative Power Projects

There has been a lot of talk in the newspapers and on the blogosphere recently about the need for alternative power development. Many prominent climate change experts such as Andrew Weaver have criticized conservationists for fighting against the development of so called alternative power project such as run-of-river power and wind power. This has frustrated me to no end as I do not see the need to choose between biodiversity and carbon emissions reduction. It is my opinion that through common sense and better communication that we can learn to live on much less electricity than we consume right now and ensure that any alternative power that we do develop is built in suitable areas that do not jeopardize the preservation of natural values and thus, ecosystem services. This article from the Tyee is an excellent insight into this discussion.

There is so much that we can do personally to fight climate change that doesn’t require the destruction of natural areas for ill thought power development projects. Lets not let the debate over government policy distract us from the choices that we can make every day! Here are just a few:

1 - Grow your own food or buy local organic food

Believe it or not, industrial agriculture is one of the leading contributors to overall Greenhouse Gas Emissions. If you include the GHG emissions from transporting food long distances, the use of petroleum based fertilizers, and the industrial emissions from fossil food creation, agriculture contributes upwards of 15% of total global emissions. The North American diet may in fact be responsible for a higher amount of emissions due to the high consumption of processed foods.

Your own garden on the other hand is completely carbon neutral if you do not use petroleum based fertilizers. This food is also free to produce, and very healthy too. Local organic foods are also a good choice if you do not have the ability to grow your own garden. Check out Local Harvest to learn where you can buy locally grown food. Locally grown food has the added benefits of knowing who is producing your food, the practices of the farmer who grows your food, and the reduction in emissions needed to transport the food. Most communities even have farmers markets at convenient locations to make the switch to locally produced foods an easy process.

2 - When you need a new product, check the thrift store and classifieds for a used alternative

Buying new products may seem like a great way to get your money’s worth, but new products are not always better. Modern manufacturing processes have led to a continued decrease in the quality of products and the time before they fail (any ipod owner will know exactly what I am talking about). A great way to contribute to fighting climate change is to reduce your consumption of new products. Used products are often just as good as a new product (often better). Websites like craigslist or usedvictoria can find you the product you need for a fraction of the cost. In addition, shopping at thrift stores and garage sales is a great way to meet the needs of your “shopping itch” without emptying your bank account.

3 - Reduce consumption of electronic entertainment

Believe it or not, TV, MP3’s, and video games have not been with the human race for very long. The technology needed for these forms of entertainment are extremely environmentally destructive to make (plastics, heavy metals, water, electricity) and consume a lot of electricity when we use them. The modern fad to own the latest gadget can greatly increase your carbon footprint, decrease the amount of time spent outside, and contribute to health issues such as mental health problems, obesity, and heart disease. In addition, electronics consume huge amounts of electricity, even when they are turned off.
Getting outside not only reconnects you with the natural world, but is a great way to reduce stress, increase clarity of thought, and increase self esteem. Some organizations are working to fight what has been called Nature Deficit Disorder as people are more and more losing connection with the natural world. For more information on the importance of nature, check out the book Last Child in the Woods by Richard Louv.

4 - For exercise, why not ride your bike to work?

Riding a bike is a great way to reduce stress, get exercise, and reduce your dependence on fossil fuels. Many people find that when they ride their bike they feel a great sense of freedom in not having to worry about parking and traffic.

Riding a bike as your main form of transportation is much easier than you might think. Many city busses now have bike racks for helping with extra long distances. More and more cities are expanding their bike trails and installing bike lanes on the sides of roads. Some people perceive cycling as dangerous in the city, but if compared to the rate and seriousness of automobile accidents, cycling is actually statistically much safer. With the introduction of electric assist bicycles, cycling has never been more accessible, even to those with disabilities. If you live in BC, the government might also give you a cash incentive up to $1300 to remove your old car off the road and replace it with a bicycle or electric bike.

5 - Donate to land conservation organizations or promote the protection of natural areas to your local political representative

One of our main tools to fight climate change is carbon sequestration through the preservation of natural areas. Organizations such as The Land Conservancy, The Nature Trust, are all working to preserve natural areas. The more land we can protect from development, the greater ability we will have to pull carbon emissions out of the atmosphere. Natural places not only contribute to the reduction in GHG emissions, they also provide other important ecosystem services such as clean water, crop pollination, waste absorption, and even cultural, social, and spiritual inspiration!

Can you think of other creative ways to fight climate change or reduce energy consumption? Post them in the comments section below!

 

Thursday
23Apr2009

Why Isn't the Brain Green? Exploring the Psychosocial Dimensions of Climate Change

This is a recent article in the New York Times exploring the human decision-making processes related to the environment, particularly climate change. A brief excerpt from this article reads “Let’s start with the fact that climate change is anthropogenic,” Weber told me one morning in her Columbia office. “More or less, people have agreed on that. That means it’s caused by human behavior. That’s not to say that engineering solutions aren’t important. But if it’s caused by human behavior, then the solution probably also lies in changing human behavior."

There could be no point more important than this. As we examine climate change within a social context, and try to understand the barriers and incentives to behaviour change, it is essential to understand how we make our decisions; how the human mind processes climate change and environmental information; how we can formulate messages to aid in their positive absorption; and how to effectively address the end-user of climate change information.

 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/magazine/19Science-t.html

To learn more about the work of the Centre for Research on Environmental Decisions, follow this link:

http://www.cred.columbia.edu/